Topic
My new homemade Ti Cone… what connection have others done??
Forum Posting
A Membership is required to post in the forums. Login or become a member to post in the member forums!
Home › Forums › Gear Forums › Make Your Own Gear › My new homemade Ti Cone… what connection have others done??
- This topic has 12 replies, 6 voices, and was last updated 8 years ago by DancingBear.
-
AuthorPosts
-
Jan 21, 2017 at 1:20 pm #3446381
Ended up taking a 3-year hiatus from BPL due to life change, busyness, etc etc… but finally back in a place where I get to spend time on UL backpacking and MYOG so gotta post one of my latest projects. This is two part, the pot and the cone.
The pot is a large IMUSA mug from Wal-Mart that I chopped off the fixed handle and made folding handles out of shirt hanger. Took a while to get the bend right so they conform to the mug, but in the end came out very well. I was worried about their ability to hold up to the weight of the water, but this setup has proved much stronger than expected. The bracket is just aluminum flashing, folded over and strengthened w/ a small section of the old handle, cut to fit.
*
But the bigger item is the cone. Its a split cone w/ an inverted wood burning section made from TiGoat titanium I got for Christmas :) I know lots of people have made cones so that’s nothing new… but the one item I think I’ve innovated on somewhat (and what I’m curious about how others have done this) is the connection between the two ends. Duplicating Trail Design’s interlocking dovetail connection seemed pretty difficult with hobby-level tools… I didn’t want to do interlocking slots/tabs either… so I opted for a LACING connection instead. Its just 1/4″ holes punched in each side, then laced w/ a “ribbon” of slightly less than 1/4″ wide titanium. At this point, I’ve tested the setup 5+ times w/ wood, and many times w/ esbit & alcohol… put it together and taken it apart 50+ times. Its a little finicky to do the lacing (would be very tough w/ gloves on), but the connection is very solid and lightweight. ((sorry for the sideways pics….))
*
*
*
–this burn pic was taken before I split the cone… I initially built it as a single piece but it drove me crazy that I couldn’t pack it in the pot. After some testing, realized I wanted the fully inserted height to be a little lower anyway, so split the cone, shortened the lower section and wood insert, and reassembled.
But as stated above, my big question for everyone who’s made a homemade cone, is what sort of connection did you do and why? I searched around the forums and couldn’t find much on that topic.
Jan 21, 2017 at 1:27 pm #3446382cripes… forgot the most important part… weights!
Split Cone alone (if burning esbit/alcohol) – 41g
Wood burning accessories (inverted cone, mesh floor, ring to support mesh floor, stakes to support pot) – 39g
Total Weight – 80g
Jan 21, 2017 at 8:06 pm #3446454Looks great!
If you put a few bends along those holes, you could slide a stake straight though. Probably a bit heavier than your strip, but easy with gloves on. Instead of a stake, maybe you could make a wider ribbon and then fold it along the length in to a V or Z to give is some rigidity so you can insert it like a stake.
I currently use slots and tabs, but I’m not that happy with them.
You should take a look at zenstoves.net if you haven’t yet. They’ve got gobs of info on windscreens and pot stands.
Jan 21, 2017 at 8:52 pm #3446459Not sure if you would consider it an “interlocking slots/tabs” joint, but I use a flat lock seam that runs the length of the ends to be joined:
Jan 22, 2017 at 11:29 am #3446518@autox – Rene, now THAT is the right way to do stakes. Thanks for the suggestion! I thought about using stakes but for some reason didn’t conceptualize bending the screen “vertically” like you suggest… I tried “horizontal” bends so the connection become very wavy, which I didn’t like at all. Since bending like you did may take up a little length on the circumference of the cone, I’m not sure if I’ll be able to switch to that method at this point (my cone is almost too tight on the pot as it is), but I’ll very likely use this method for my next cone. Thanks again!
@gearmaker – David, thanks for sharing. I did think of this option but really wanted a connection that locked the cone both directions (compression and tension) so didn’t go this route. I imagine this would probably work just fine 99% of the time, especially if it was a single (not split) cone. But the lower section of a split cone is (at least partially) being compressed inward by the upper cone, which this connection doesn’t seem like it would resist much at all. Have you ever had issues w/ the joint coming undone?Jan 22, 2017 at 12:06 pm #3446530Rudy, you’re totally correct about the flat lock seam not being good in compression. I haven’t had any issues with this type of joint, but my cones are only in tension.
Jan 22, 2017 at 12:50 pm #3446540Shoulder rivets, as seen on the old Pac-Flat reflectors for candle lanterns, might be an interesting option. I haven’t tried them on a windscreen, but the worked great on the reflectors.
Walt
Jan 22, 2017 at 12:57 pm #3446544Several years ago I made a titanium foil roll-up wood stove with horizontal tabs for the closure. I used very brittle (after heating) 15-3-3-3 beta titanium alloy foil, and a crack in the edge of the foil is visible in the photo below. I wouldn’t expect this to be a problem with CP grades, especially if all corners are rounded in the cut. This kind of tab doesn’t allow any hoop tension, so it might or might not work for your application. The whole project is described here.
Jan 22, 2017 at 1:47 pm #3446552Here’s what I settled on: This is an early cone stitched together with a piece of brazing rod I had on hand. A ti skewer stake works well too.
I like this for its simplicity and ‘bi-directional’ stability. The ease of actually threading the rod through the holes depends on the size of the holes and how far apart the holes are.
Some of the overlapping excess material can be trimmed for weight savings:
-Lance
Jan 23, 2017 at 12:19 pm #3446727To join upper and lower halves of a split cone, put square teeth on the adjoining edges (like what you see across the top of a castle). Bend them out slightly to make it easier to connect the halves. Be sure the vertical seams in the two halves are not aligned – best if their 180d apart.
This will lock out any horizontal/circumferential motion (change in diameter) at the horizontal seam, as well as inhibit any vertical shifting of the facing edges at either vertical seam.
Jan 23, 2017 at 4:39 pm #3446786@dancingbear – definitely not familiar w/ the Pac-Flat reflectors. I’ll have to look those up. Is there any advantage to the shoulder rivet, vs just a standard rivet? I’d be interested if there’s a “key hole” type rivet that’s wider at its top to help “lock-in” the connection.
@ckrusor – Colin, that’s an awesome wood stove! I’d love to know more about how you made it and how it performed. Obviously you had the material issue, but how did it do otherwise? I recently made the “Penny Wood Stove” as well and have been really happy w/ how it performs so would love a super light, foldable version like yours :)
@lancem – Lance, that’s a nice basic connection. Definitely a fair bit of extra material due to the large overlap needed, but I bet this is very easy to connect!
@autox – Rene, do you have any pictures of the square castle connection? I think I’m envisioning it correctly but am curious to see one actually built. If I’m picturing it right, there would be a lot of tabs to get hung up things/eachother when rolling. I’m a big fan of nice smooth edges so that would probably drive me nuts :)Jan 23, 2017 at 7:51 pm #3446814https://backpackinglight.com/forums/topic/57714/
Yes, you get an upper and lower edge covered in tabs. You can trim them to semi-circles to reduce the potential for snagged corners, and bend them slightly inwards instead of out, to reduce the chances of snagging. You could also reduce it to 2 tabs so there are fewer to cause trouble.
Jan 25, 2017 at 3:20 pm #3447113The heads of the shoulder rivets stand up a bit from the surface they’re riveted to, and the head is larger than the rest of the rivet, so it makes sort of a button. This can engage with a hole on the mating part. The tension of the sheet metal will hold it in place.
Here’s a link to the candle lantern reflector so you can see how it’s used.
http://ucogear.com/pac-flat-reflector.html
Walt
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Forum Posting
A Membership is required to post in the forums. Login or become a member to post in the member forums!
Our Community Posts are Moderated
Backpacking Light community posts are moderated and here to foster helpful and positive discussions about lightweight backpacking. Please be mindful of our values and boundaries and review our Community Guidelines prior to posting.
Get the Newsletter
Gear Research & Discovery Tools
- Browse our curated Gear Shop
- See the latest Gear Deals and Sales
- Our Recommendations
- Search for Gear on Sale with the Gear Finder
- Used Gear Swap
- Member Gear Reviews and BPL Gear Review Articles
- Browse by Gear Type or Brand.